Fortunately, for us, main-stream Humans do not really believe.
This news report (if you can call it that, highly biased and disrepectful as it is)
is typical of the reporting American news services give to the topic of "UFO's."
(It is worth noting also that nearly all Human media seems to have lost the meaning
of the word "UFO." Technically it means "there's something in the sky, and I don't
know what it is." Common meaning however has become "ET is here." One wonders what
they call "unidentified flying objects" now? Especially with the newest craze - "dones" -
bursting out all over. From here on out, "UFO" sightings will never more be
reliable. The reliable ones are all from before the Humans invented the Internet,
Photoshop and dones. There's no way to tell if a photo is real or crafted,
so even real photos can no longer be validated as such by Human technologies.)
British and other news services are not much better. Another recent report (from Britain)
admits that a call for help was made to their police emergency services because an alien
abduction was in progress and the call was "blown off." No officers responded. So it's
not just the Americans that refuse to take it seriously.
The Pleiadian Council
says that at this stage of Human cultural development this is
probably for the best, that we continue working through the few who believe and can
"take it," even when they get the facts wrong or mistranslate what they are given.
The Draconian Council
says that this is very tasty, and a good thing. It leaves the
Humans vulnerable. Who would defend against something they don't even believe in?
The Arcturian Council
says: Good! It's more rewarding and accurate to study a subject
species when they do not know they're being studied. (MIB Comment: Who can argue
with that? However, the possible fallicy is in the definition of "study" plus
the Observer principal, which applies in so many ways, here...)
Here's the article and video: Channel 9 News, Colorado, USA. You will see that it
is entirely disrepectful to the subject.
(For how that amounts to "news reporting" you may want to consult a Xeno-Ethnologist
at the ETs Only Lounges, MIB Library Services Division)
CIA Declassifies 50 years old documents, about events half a world away
From Tibet to Nepal, the CIA recorded 13 million pages of documentation, concerning a hand full of
sightings over the Himalayas, around 1968.
Big risk, now, right? 50 year old events, and if there's really any data in those documents, it's buried
some where inside 13 million pages. Not really a news release, is it? That's the Human intelligence
agencies, rarely living up to their collective name. Clearly a political action, rather than an informative one.
What does make it interesting, though, is that these are official sighting, filed by the [American] CIA
itself. Not random sightings by Ferd and Mildred late on a 6-beer Friday night, or some such. These are CIA
sightings.
But remember [because you won't get it from Human news media] "UFO" does not mean "flying saucer." It
means Unidentified Flying Object. Is it in the sky? Is it something we don't know what? Then it's a UFO. These
days, however, Human media has made UFO a synonym to "alien space craft." So, heads-up, that will not be
reflected in offical government documents of 50 years past.
From the Huffington Post, a slightly tongue-in-cheek view that Donald Trump, the new Supreme
Over Lord of Earth, is in fact an Alien (that is, a non-human, whether Earth-born or not).
The question is: which one you did sponsor, create, manipulate, gengineer or otherwise plant
that weird, Bad-SciFi creature on this planet? And did it really go the way you had in mind? If so,
well done. Either way, you may have a lot to answer for if the
Earth Affairs Council
decides you out-stepped the Rules of Engagement on this planet.
We have standards, after all...
Dec 2016 -- Featured Items of Interest
Humans are persistent in their desire for their World to End, aren't they?
(How can any one get that bored?)
Best Crop Circles of 2016 -- You guys out did yourselves this year
These certainly were not done with ropes and pulleys, were they?